In a work of this scope, it is impossible to describe all the wars
between the petty kingdoms peopled by races of various languages, which
occupied Scotland. In 603, in the wild moors at Degsastane, between
the Liddel burn and the passes of the Upper Tyne, the English Aethelfrith
of Deira, with an army of the still pagan ancestors of the Borderers,
utterly defeated Aidan, King of Argyll, with the Christian converted
Scots. Henceforth, for more than a century, the English between
Forth and Humber feared neither Scot of the west nor Pict of the north.
On the death of Aethelfrith (617), the Christian west and north exercised
their influences; one of Aethelfrith's exiled sons married a Pictish
princess, and became father of a Pictish king, another, Oswald, was
baptised at Iona; and the new king of the northern English of Lothian,
Edwin, was converted by Paullinus (627), and held Edinburgh as his capital.
Later, after an age of war and ruin, Oswald, the convert of Iona, restored
Christianity in northern England; and, after his fall, his brother,
Oswiu, consolidated the north English. In 685 Oswiu's son
Egfrith crossed the Forth and invaded Pictland with a Northumbrian army,
but was routed with great loss, and was slain at Nectan's Mere,
in Forfarshire. Thenceforth, till 761, the Picts were dominant,
as against Scots and north English, Angus MacFergus being then their
leader (731-761).
Now the invaders and settlers from Scandinavia, the Northmen on the
west coast, ravaged the Christian Scots of the west, and burned Iona:
finally, in 844-860, Kenneth MacAlpine of Kintyre, a Scot of Dalriada
on the paternal, a Pict on the mother's side, defeated the Picts
and obtained their throne. By Pictish law the crown descended
in the maternal line, which probably facilitated the coronation of Kenneth.
To the Scots and “to all Europe” he was a Scot; to the Picts,
as son of a royal Pictish mother, he was a Pict. With him, at
all events, Scots and Picts were interfused, and there began the Scottish
dynasty, supplanting the Pictish, though it is only in popular tales
that the Picts were exterminated.
Owing to pressure from the Northmen sea-rovers in the west, the capital
and the seat of the chief bishop, under Kenneth MacAlpine (844-860),
were moved eastwards from Iona to Scone, near Perth, and after an interval
at Dunkeld, to St Andrews in Fife.
The line of Kenneth MacAlpine, though disturbed by quarrels over
the succession, and by Northmen in the west, north, and east, none the
less in some way “held a good grip o' the gear” against
Vikings, English of Lothian, and Welsh of Strathclyde. In consequence
of a marriage with a Welsh princess of Strathclyde, or Cumberland, a
Scottish prince, Donald, brother of Constantine II., became king of
that realm (908), and his branch of the family of MacAlpin held Cumbria
for a century.
English Claims over Scotland.
In 924 the first claim by an English king, Edward, to the over-lordship
of Scotland appears in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. The entry contains
a manifest error, and the topic causes war between modern historians,
English and Scottish. In fact, there are several such entries
of Scottish acceptance of English suzerainty under Constantine II.,
and later, but they all end in the statement, “this held not long.”
The “submission” of Malcolm I. to Edmund (945) is not a
submission but an alliance; the old English word for “fellow-worker,”
or “ally,” designates Malcolm as fellow-worker with Edward
of England.
This word (midwyrhta) was translated fidelis (one who gives
fealty) in the Latin of English chroniclers two centuries later, but
Malcolm I. held Cumberland as an ally, not as a subject prince of England.
In 1092 an English chronicle represents Malcolm III. as holding Cumberland
“by conquest.”
The main fact is that out of these and similar dim transactions arose
the claims of Edward I. to the over-lordship of Scotland,-claims
that were urged by Queen Elizabeth's minister, Cecil, in 1568,
and were boldly denied by Maitland of Lethington. From these misty
pretensions came the centuries of war that made the hardy character
of the folk of Scotland.
The Scottish Acquisition of Lothian.
We cannot pretend within our scope to follow chronologically “the
fightings and flockings of kites and crows,” in “a wolf-age,
a war-age,” when the Northmen from all Scandinavian lands, and
the Danes, who had acquired much of Ireland, were flying at the throat
of England and hanging on the flanks of Scotland; while the Britons
of Strathclyde struck in, and the Scottish kings again and again raided
or sought to occupy the fertile region of Lothian between Forth and
Tweed. If the dynasty of MacAlpin could win rich Lothian, with
its English-speaking folk, they were “made men,” they held
the granary of the North. By degrees and by methods not clearly
defined they did win the Castle of the Maidens, the acropolis of Dunedin,
Edinburgh; and fifty years later, in some way, apparently by the sword,
at the battle of Carham (1018), in which a Scottish king of Cumberland
fought by his side, Malcolm II. took possession of Lothian, the whole
south-east region, by this time entirely anglified, and this was the
greatest step in the making of Scotland. The Celtic dynasty now
held the most fertile district between Forth and Tweed, a district already
English in blood and speech, the centre and focus of the English civilisation
accepted by the Celtic kings. Under this Malcolm, too, his grandson,
Duncan, became ruler of Strathclyde-that is, practically, of Cumberland.
Malcolm is said to have been murdered at haunted Glamis, in Forfarshire,
in 1034; the room where he died is pointed out by legend in the ancient
castle. His rightful heir, by the strange system of the Scots,
should have been, not his own grandson, Duncan, but the grandson of
Kenneth III. The rule was that the crown went alternately to a
descendant of the House of Constantine (863-877), son of Kenneth MacAlpine,
and to a descendant of Constantine's brother, Aodh (877-888).
These alternations went on till the crowning of Malcolm II. (1005-1034),
and then ceased, for Malcolm II. had slain the unnamed male heir of
the House of Aodh, a son of Boedhe, in order to open the succession
to his own grandson, “the gracious Duncan.” Boedhe
had left a daughter, Gruach; she had by the Mormaor, or under-king of
the province of Murray, a son, Lulach. On the death of the Mormaor
she married Macbeth, and when Macbeth slew Duncan (1040), he was removing
a usurper-as he understood it-and he ruled in the name of
his stepson, Lulach. The power of Duncan had been weakened by
repeated defeats at the hands of the Northmen under Thorfinn.
In 1057 Macbeth was slain in battle at Lumphanan, in Aberdeenshire,
and Malcolm Canmore, son of Duncan, after returning from England, whither
he had fled from Macbeth, succeeded to the throne. But he and
his descendants for long were opposed by the House of Murray, descendants
of Lulach, who himself had died in 1058.
The world will always believe Shakespeare's version of these
events, and suppose the gracious Duncan to have been a venerable old
man, and Macbeth an ambitious Thane, with a bloodthirsty wife, he himself
being urged on by the predictions of witches. He was, in fact,
Mormaor of Murray, and upheld the claims of his stepson Lulach, who
was son of a daughter of the wrongfully extruded House of Aodh.
Malcolm Canmore, Duncan's grandson, on the other hand, represented
the European custom of direct lineal succession against the ancient
Scots' mode.